Donate
  • About
  • Rent College Pads
  • Advertise
  • Privacy
Search
News
Opinions
Sports
Classifieds
Comics
BMA
Events
Subscribe

Saturday, August 13, 2022
Print Archive

Eastern Echo
  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinions
  • Comics
  • Podcast
  • BMA
  • Events
  • Classifieds
  • Search
  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinions
  • Comics
  • Podcast
  • BMA
  • Events
  • Classifieds
Search

Subscribe to the Echo

Donate to The Echo

You can support the Echo by donating through the EMU Foundation and selecting to apply your gift to a specific fund. Any of the funds listed below will provide support to the Echo.

01049 -- EMU Echo Editor Endowed Scholarship:  Provides financial support for the current EMU Echo Editor.

02414 -- Scott Stephenson Eastern Echo Scholarship:  This expendable scholarship is for the benefit of student(s) in the School of Communication, Media & Theater Arts in the College of Arts & Sciences.  It will be awarded to a full or part-time junior or senior EMU student majoring in journalism and working for the Eastern Echo.  The student should be working to self-finance their education and not be eligible for need-based grants.

00825 -- Student Media Development:  Provides support for the Student Media program.

Thank you for supporting the Echo and EMU Student Media.

Give Now


7/6/2019, 10:41pm

Opinion: Inconsistent gun laws threaten both constitutional rights and public safety

The issues of criminal justice reform and gun reform are closely tied and often contradictory.

By Heather Weigel

Share

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Mail
  • Print
Opinion: Inconsistent gun laws threaten both constitutional rights and public safety

Photo from Unsplash.

Criminal justice reform is rarely cut-and-dry. Sometimes bills which allow for less jail time and lighter sentences directly conflict or coincide with other areas of interest, such as gun reform. 

This is the case with Michigan House Bill 4434, which is currently being reviewed in the Michigan Senate. The bill was passed in the House with bipartisan support and is one of several pieces of legislation regarding gun rights. Under the bill, gun owners carrying an expired license would see their penalty reduced to a misdemeanor rather than a felony. They would be subject to a $330 civil fine, given that the license had lapsed within a year prior to the offense, that the person was still eligible for a CPL and that it was their first offense.

The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Matt Hall (R-Emmett Twp.), framed the bill as “common sense gun reform,” much like the other weapons-related issues on the Republican caucus’s agenda this term. 

If I were a voting member in the Senate, I would want to support the pending bill, as it reduces the amount of people serving jail sentences for crimes which, though weapons-related, are nonviolent. I agree with the assertion by Hall that a felony charge is a “hefty punishment for expired paperwork.” 

Just as Michiganders forget to renew their driver’s licenses, the same can happen with a CPL. The current punishments are too steep, as violators of the laws in place could be stripped for life of their gun rights for hunting and self-defense and could find it more difficult to find housing or employment -- all because of a failure to submit paperwork. As they are not violent offenders, they should not lose their rights, especially not for life. The laws should be scaled to better reflect the issue the laws are intended to correct.

This bill relates to another issue being considered nationwide -- whether gun rights should be restored as part of second chance legislation to former felons. While I generally support second chance legislation, especially for non-violent offenders, I am a tad more skeptical on whether it should extend to restoring gun rights. 

The reinstatement of these rights is up to the states, and some have very lax qualifications for getting gun rights reinstated. Other states continue to make it difficult and embrace a “slippery slope” argument which, given this Times article, may have some validity. “Common sense gun reform” gets difficult when states find these issues entirely in their wheelhouse, and the nationwide impact of these reinstatements can be difficult to measure because of their state-by-state nature. Further, the federal government cannot intervene in the reinstatement of gun rights if the state decides to restore other civil rights, like voting, sitting in a jury and holding public office.

Another important thing to note is that the decision to restore gun rights to these felons, whether they were convicted for violent or nonviolent crimes, rests often on a judge who, given that this felon meets limited qualifications, cannot deny their request to have their gun rights reinstated. It is exceedingly complicated when states with an active gun lobby try to pass meaningful reform and place restrictions on who can get these rights reinstated -- their plans which emphasize both public safety and second amendment rights are often scrapped or altered to allow for more lenient gun laws.

I wholeheartedly wish I could stand up for gun rights for former felons, but I think it goes too far when these rights can be restored so easily to violent offenders. Given that each of these states tightened up the restrictions on violent offenders while allowing nonviolent offenders to have their civil rights restored, I would support gun rights as part of second chance legislation. Until the gun lobby starts valuing public safety to the same degree as second amendment rights, I do not see that happening.

These two types of legislation to loosen gun laws have varying implications for criminal justice reform in the states which pass them. While I don’t think the federal government should have excessive oversight, I believe significant changes should be made to place public safety and second amendment rights on equal footing. Those who commit non-violent offenses should have their gun rights secured, given they meet specific qualifications, but these qualifications need to be shaped up so they don’t put weapons in the hands of violent individuals and threaten public safety.

Share



Related Stories

NAACP President Kya Fordham reads off the list of demands of affected students at today's rally.

Recent Campus Hate Incident Displays EMU’s Lack of Protective Policy

By Malaya Elgarico and Arica Frisbey

Conservatives should support same-sex decision

By Alison Basley

Medicaid gives assistance to low-income individuals

By Taylor Pinson


The Eastern Echo welcomes thoughtful discussion on all of our stories, but please keep comments civil and on-topic. Read our full guidelines here.


Most Popular


8/8/2022, 8:15am

7th annual Heritage car show returns on August 13th at Gene Butman Ford

By Sarah Schneider

The car show is open to car classes from before 1959 to now.


8/9/2022, 8:00am

Ypsilanti Town Recreation Department hosting first annual cornhole tournament


8/9/2022, 8:00am

Review: ‘Not Okay’ is a social media satire film


8/11/2022, 7:40am

EMU faculty head to the bargaining table


Podcast


2/26/2022, 7:45pm

Podcast: February 23rd, 2022


5/14/2022, 6:20pm

Podcast: May 14th, 2022


4/22/2022, 11:14am

Podcast: April 21, 2022


4/14/2022, 9:26am

Podcast: April 14, 2022


Tweets by TheEasternEcho
Eastern Michigan Echo To Homepage
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Freelance
  • Submissions
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Distribution

All Rights Reserved

© Copyright 2022 The Eastern Echo

Powered by Solutions by The State News.