Sunday, February 12, 2012  | 34°F 7-Day Forecast

The Eastern Echo

News and nonsense spiced with nerve

Marriages should add expiration date

Marriage is a nerve-racking idea for both men and women. Men are taught to run screaming from the idea, while women are fed fairy tales of knights on white horses who will scoop them up and make every wish come true. Neither idea leaves people with a very strong idea of what they’re really getting themselves into when they say, “I do.”

Society tells us we should get married at some point in our lives. But uncertainty mixed with a hazy assumption of what marriage will be like leads to one thing: divorce.

According to a CBS Evening News story and countless studies, the United States has one of the highest divorce rates in the world.

The ironic thing is, many people are scared to walk down the aisle because they don’t want to end up in divorce court, and that’s exactly where they end up. So, wouldn’t it be great if we could try married life, but still have a way out if we learn it just isn’t right?

We can taste-test ice cream, tour a house before we buy it and test-drive a car before we sign the papers. Why can’t we “test drive” marriage? The exciting thing is, we could.

A few years ago I heard the most brilliant idea spouted by Jenny McCarthy – yes the crazy blond from MTV’s Singled Out. She said marriage licenses should be like driver’s licenses. After four years they expire.

When I first heard this idea, I laughed. Then I really thought about it and realized the brilliance behind her idea. Follow me on this one.

Joe meets Jane. Joe and Jane get married. Joe and Jane want to kill each other. Joe and Jane are stuck in divorce court, spending oodles of money and slinging mud at each other. Joe and Jane end up angry, alone and bitter about things ending the way they did.

If McCarthy’s idea was a reality, Joe and Jane could have just waited for their marriage license to expire, said “sayonara,” and walked away from each other.
Putting an expiration date on a marriage license could solve one of the biggest marital problems – honesty. If a couple gets married, at the end of four years (or however long the license is good for) the couple would have to sit down and ask each other “is this working for you? Is this working for me?”

If it is, they can renew for another four years. If not, they can let the thing expire and use the money they saved on divorce attorneys to go on singles retreats and try again with someone new.

Think of all the fighting and tears the couple could save each other. Not to mention, kids would no longer be thrown in the middle of an angry custody battle. The licenses would state in the fine print – in the event of an expired marriage license, all assets are split 50/50 and children are subject to joint custody. It really could be that simple.

McCarthy’s idea could also help aid state economies. If a couple wants to renew their marriage license, they have to pay the Secretary of State $50 for another license. There could also be extra fines for couples that forget to renew but want to stay married. Sounds like a win/win to me.

For those critics who think my words are the rant of a cynical chick – you’re partially right. I am a ranting chick, but I do believe in marriage. I just don’t believe in dealing with extra hassles and drama if I can avoid it. Sure, I’ll probably get married some day. But if it doesn’t work out, I’d rather wait for my marriage license to expire and have the chance to walk away from my husband as civil friends than fight him in open court for custody of our dogs.

Maybe some people like the drama of divorce court. Maybe some people think McCarthy is crazy. I happen to think many have underestimated her genius and I would love to start a state petition to put an expiration date on all marriage licenses.


  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Digg this
  • Add to del.icio.us
  • Blogger
  • Comment feed
  • |
  • Print
  • Email
Section: Opinions
8 Comments
April 8 at 12:26 PM
by Leah Shaw

This is ridiculous. You want to punish couples who are happily married by charging them a $50 fee to renew their license? We should get rewarded for our commitment, maturity and decision making skills. The point of DATING is so that you can see whether you two are good together. And you really think that this would be better on the kids? Absolutely not. If you want a marriage license, then you should look into a child-bearing license as well.

Flag for moderation
April 8 at 3:17 PM
by Heather Brown

I have never been more livid after reading the Eastern Echo than I was today. Marriage has an experiation date, death. When you say vows you say “until death do us part”. The idea behind marriage is very simple actually, loving someone unconditionally and being by their side forever. It’s because of people like you and Jenny Mcarthy that our divorce rates have gone up so much. I am so sick of hearing people talk about marriage like it’s a hassle and something you can just leave if you don’t like it. It’s not, it’s a commitment, a very serious commitment that should be made with mature thinking and love not because you feel society tells you to. You want to taste test a marriage, hello it’s called dating/engagement. Live together, spend time together and see how things work, if they don’t work out don’t get married. Heck you could do that for 4 years or even 10. I am honestly scared of what may come if people keep treating the idea of marriage like this.

Flag for moderation
April 9 at 2:26 AM
by Andrea

You obviously have the wrong idea of marriage. You shouldn’t ever get married if you’re already planning for a divorce. I think the post by Heather Brown says enough.

Flag for moderation
April 9 at 1:03 PM
by pastor

Dear Hannah- I can see from the staggering statistic that you are looking at do not look promising for long-term marriage. Yes, it is very sick to look at the numbers. I empathize with you, as I myself am looking to be married one day. Looking at the way the world is going is not too bright. Yet, we must shed some light on marriage. For one, some of our parents have not set a good example. My parents have been together for over 30 years, but it was not always good. During the rough spots, it drove me out of the house to engage in illicit activities to cover up pain. I had a best friend who after 6 months of marriage was cheated on…needless to say they were divorced shortly thereafter. I know good godly men and women who have also divorced. Being in ministry, where we are supposed to be people, following after Christ, who believe in reconciliation, healing, redemption, and true love and then to hear of divorce rates in the church..YIKES! God help! In all this, set against this generation, I still believe in long-last marriages. Healthy and whole! Don’t let the situations you see determine how things could be for your life. We must be willing to do what to takes to lay down our selfishness, our materialism, our individual necessities to make it work. We must work at it. Unfortunately, at the same time we are influenced by lazy people around us who have given up. Truly sad. (not always the case – infidelity and abuse are acceptable means of divorce) Don’t give up…don’t give in to the spirit of this age. You can make, you can do it. I see the hope in article your article for marriage but don’t let Hollywood determine your future.

Flag for moderation
April 9 at 2:29 PM
by Tucker

To pastor: Shouldn’t marriage, according to scripture, only be reserved for those who would otherwise burn in their lust for one another and the most appropriate state to be in is celibate, especially if you found God while single(I Cor. 7:8-9, 7:20, 7:32-35)? Does not marriage take your eyes/attention off God? See – there would be a LOT less divorce if Christians didn’t marry because of imminent eschatology and their ACTUAL following their Word of the Lord in its entirety… not just the parts that are convienient to you. So before you begin to preach to Hannah about her right to an opinion that may have merit – based on possible social and economic trends that are relevant, try actually looking at all of the “data” that you as a Christian claim to use in your decision making about such an instituion as marriage.

Flag for moderation
April 9 at 6:16 PM
by pastor

Dear Tucker – Thank you for your insight. Would you mine sharing where you stand in this whole discussion? What is your worldview in regards to marriage? Are you going to marry? Are you hopeful about marriage?

Flag for moderation
April 10 at 1:02 PM
by Realistic

I wouldn’t see it as a punishment as much as a re-commitment. It seems impractical in today’s ever changing society for people to think far enough head to consider 50 years from now. Most people barely have next week planned…much left the rest of their life. And why would it be a punishment? Then wouldn’t you think that paying for an education is punishment? Or having to pay in order to drive legally? Or even taxes on products you NEED to survive. In today’s society of give and take this is another way of give and take. Adding to it one area that NO ONE brought up was what this does to children…of any age. Forget the adults but I thought we were all supposed to be involved in marriage for the children. Isn’t this a better alternative instead of what’s currently going on???

Flag for moderation
April 12 at 9:33 AM
by Tucker

Dear pastor: I really don’t have a “worldview” on marriage as what may work in our culture/country/society may not work in others. Nor do I think that my opinion on this subject holds any weight. I feel each of us has the right to decide for ourselves how important the instituion of marriage should be. It does hold many economic and societal implications, more so than religious ones in this country and so for many that is all that matters. But when religion is brought into it, it seems that too often that the measure that is used is often tilted towards ones own biases- and from there it is certain verses or views expounded by past doctrine (& usually not in its entirety) that is brought to bear on those who may feel diferently. I am totally for you having your belief that marriage is a sacred institution… perhaps if more people thought that way then we would have less divorce. But they don’t and therefore we have the situation we do a divorce rate with a national avg. at about 50-55% (of course this varies by location and socio-economic status) and subsequently in need of a different way to look at/deal with marriage. I think Hannah was trying to bring in a different view to show that there are those out there trying to make it a better fit for many people. Maybe have two kinds of marriage – who knows, but the old way isn’t working for everybody – or would you disagree? And stomping our feet and telling Hannah she is a a moron (not in those direct words of course) for holding different views than you or the other three women who commented will result in nothing. At least Hannah is brainstorming in a sense.

Flag for moderation

Leave a response

All fields are required.

 Your email address will not be published.
HTML is not allowed.
 What is the LAST name of the current US president?
From the Blogs

Today's front page

front page

Upcoming Events
Today's top events
  • No events for this date
Monday's top events
  • No events for this date
Tuesday's top events
  • No events for this date
Wednesday's top events
  • No events for this date
Thursday's top events
  • No events for this date
Follow us
DS