Letter: Proposed weapon legislation good for colleges
In the Echo’s recent article on the proposed legislation to allow the carrying of weapons on campus, a variety of critics voiced their concerns. As a supporter of this bill, I would like to address those points. First, to Police Chief O’Dell, who said, “Say you have a situation where officers are pulling up and everyone has guns. There’s no way of telling who the bad guys are.”
It seems Chief O’Dell believes that situation would be better if only the “bad guys” had guns, which they could freely use to harm or threaten the innocent. I fail to see what makes that advantageous. Further, I see no reason he couldn’t apply the same protocol he would in a non-gun-free zone; namely, halting everyone and then sorting out the facts.
Possibly related:
- Remember: Women are more than just breasts · Feb 12
- Valentine's Day an overrated holiday · Feb 12
- Campaign finance laws not right for Left, Right · Feb 12
- Contract questioned · Feb 8
- Creationist theme park shouldn't get backing · Feb 8
President Martin, siding with the police chief, said, “We have a great police department and there’s no need for this.” However, my email inbox, which is filled with “Timely Warnings to the Community,” shows the police are not everywhere at all times. In the case of open-carrying, seeing a holster will certainly make a potential mugger less likely to attack the carrier. For both open- and concealed-carry, being in a position to exercise self-defense is much better than resigning gun-ownership to those who commit crimes.
Finally, Violetta Shuman also shared her opinion: “Anything can trigger someone to get upset. Who is to say they won’t shoot?” Well, the facts say they won’t. The National Center for Policy Analysis reported study findings that people licensed to carry concealed weapons are actually 5.7 times less likely to commit violent crimes than the general public (13.5 times for non-violent). I don’t shoot people out of rage for the same reason I don’t punch people with whom I disagree.
Self-control doesn’t fly out the window once you own a gun. Furthermore, her prediction that “violence would increase drastically” doesn’t match the fact that supermarkets, downtown areas and businesses aren’t barraged with the bullets of open and concealed-carry gun owners who frequent them each day. Such knee-jerk reactions to guns have no place in crafting well-reasoned legislation.
Gordon Kangas
Senior
Arts Management
- |
by tatman
Bravo Gordon, A well thought out and well written article. People oppsosed to the carrying of firearms should just read the facts. As you stated, licensed concealed carry permit holders are an extremely law abiding group of people, far more so than the general public. There are many studies, including from the FBI and the Michigan State Police to back this up. I am just of the opinion that if confronted by someone like the Virginia Tech shooter or the Fort Hood shooter that is deciding whether I will live or die, I want to have a firm say in that process and my concealed pistol gives me that chance.
Flag for moderationby go green
When—not if, when, because the world is full of crazy people and it’s only a matter of time before one of them is an undergrad at EMU—an unstable individual starts running through Pray Harrold spraying bullets, I sincerely hope that there will be many others who AREN’T crazy there with guns to stop him. I would also like to point out that an individual must be 21 years old to get a CCW, so most of the people whose maturity I question—namely, the freshmen who have never lived without mommy holding their hands—won’t be given the right to carry anyways.
Next thing you know, I won’t be allowed to carry my pepper spray anymore because DPS is 100% capable of making sure I never get mugged or raped on or near campus, along with the other however-many-thousands of women are on campus.
Flag for moderation